Shamans & the Tai Chi
The Shamanistic cultures -- since whenever -- intuitively knew the causal effect of our relationship with Ra, Helios, Great Spirit, the Sun-Behind-the-Sun, etc. The celestial bodies were like friends and relatives who were always welcome in their homes. You are familiar with all of the names.
So what if the Shamans anthropomorphize(d) all of life as having life. That is much closer to the Truth than what the Darwinian-based reductionist huff and puff about. Their so-called "science" (i.e., "knowledge derived only from the senses, which is not what Bacon was about anyway), is now inching its way into the realm of the "knowing". A knowing that has always been regarded as "spiritual" but not "religious." As the Taoists say, the Pursuit of (capital T )Truth can lead to no other place.
Simultaneously, you have the "new" study of the various "energy fields" coming out of the research basements up into the more well-funded rooms of scientific respectability. Modern Physics calls this the unified field theory; those studying the mind call it the collective consciousness fields, or electrical intuitive fields. Whether we like it or not, we are electromagnetic fields, that through the transduction of resonance, we are continually energized. And, we are energized from the invisible to the visible, not the other way around.
Have you ever wondered why reductionist science has never figured out how to duplicate photosynthesis? This is the process through which they say we gain our sustenance. We would die without it. Yet, as the great ape (no longer the "Lesser God" of antiquity), we live and move because of something that we cannot see, we cannot understand, and we cannot duplicate. Hmmmm.
Personally, as I see the study of history, I see the Tai Chi (conflict to the Westerner); the ever-seeking of balance. The Taoists, the Shamans, those involved in the study of the "new" sciences, all see the Tai Chi as a whole. There are two "opposing" forces within the whole. There are long-wave and short-waves of this balancing, and they all overlap.
The reductionist, and their progeny of "mechanics and engineering" see only the parts. They, and hence the current masses, derive all of their thinking from the parts. They are lost in the maze of parts and cannot see the whole. They deduce that those who see the entirety of the whole are simply superstitious and are cultural throwbacks.
But (perhaps to their dismay), their inability to see the whole in no way effects the outcome of the balancing. In no way effects the design of the whole. The mass-thought does gum up the works, but it cannot alter the design.
Because there is no such thing as a permanent trend (Gann said that, I think), we are moving into a "re-balancing" cycle. And, yes, I am very familiar with all of the scalar science, HAARP, and all that. But, as to the "shaking-off" of the planet being self-directed, well, Mother earth (which is appropriate) can take care of herself.
All the best to you, and thank you for your service."
Peace
So what if the Shamans anthropomorphize(d) all of life as having life. That is much closer to the Truth than what the Darwinian-based reductionist huff and puff about. Their so-called "science" (i.e., "knowledge derived only from the senses, which is not what Bacon was about anyway), is now inching its way into the realm of the "knowing". A knowing that has always been regarded as "spiritual" but not "religious." As the Taoists say, the Pursuit of (capital T )Truth can lead to no other place.
Simultaneously, you have the "new" study of the various "energy fields" coming out of the research basements up into the more well-funded rooms of scientific respectability. Modern Physics calls this the unified field theory; those studying the mind call it the collective consciousness fields, or electrical intuitive fields. Whether we like it or not, we are electromagnetic fields, that through the transduction of resonance, we are continually energized. And, we are energized from the invisible to the visible, not the other way around.
Have you ever wondered why reductionist science has never figured out how to duplicate photosynthesis? This is the process through which they say we gain our sustenance. We would die without it. Yet, as the great ape (no longer the "Lesser God" of antiquity), we live and move because of something that we cannot see, we cannot understand, and we cannot duplicate. Hmmmm.
Personally, as I see the study of history, I see the Tai Chi (conflict to the Westerner); the ever-seeking of balance. The Taoists, the Shamans, those involved in the study of the "new" sciences, all see the Tai Chi as a whole. There are two "opposing" forces within the whole. There are long-wave and short-waves of this balancing, and they all overlap.
The reductionist, and their progeny of "mechanics and engineering" see only the parts. They, and hence the current masses, derive all of their thinking from the parts. They are lost in the maze of parts and cannot see the whole. They deduce that those who see the entirety of the whole are simply superstitious and are cultural throwbacks.
But (perhaps to their dismay), their inability to see the whole in no way effects the outcome of the balancing. In no way effects the design of the whole. The mass-thought does gum up the works, but it cannot alter the design.
Because there is no such thing as a permanent trend (Gann said that, I think), we are moving into a "re-balancing" cycle. And, yes, I am very familiar with all of the scalar science, HAARP, and all that. But, as to the "shaking-off" of the planet being self-directed, well, Mother earth (which is appropriate) can take care of herself.
All the best to you, and thank you for your service."
Peace
posted by RML at 1:01 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home