Hollow Moons

A few additional logs for the fire:

1) In the '60s, everyone in the geology world was excited about the possibility of what was called "Operation Mole." The idea was to bore into the earth farther than any probe had ever gone. The implications would forever maintain or immediately alter the scientific theories inherent in gravity/density/electromagnetism/geo-dynamics/etc.
As none of us heard anything about it, this would indicate:
(a) that the project was canned (you fill in the blanks as to why);
(b) that it proceeded with observations not conforming to any desired result; or,
(c) the state-of-the-art technology was not up to the challenge.

2) Also in the '60s, a ho-hum scientific theory was put forward in which the astro-mathematical model for the moons of Mars (Phobos [meaning "fear"] and Deimos [meaning "Panic"]) came to some interesting conclusions. Given the dimensions (which would also include calculated weight) and historical orbits, Phobos should not be in orbit around Mars. What was surmised was that (principally Phobos) was "not natural." They did not postulate an alternative to “not natural”; but, when you conclude that something is "not natural" what other options are there?!! Who wants to start messing about with “artificial” moon concepts and ALL that would imply?! This study, BTW, came and went rather quickly.

3) As Soviet science was/is not strapped by having to adhere to various religious dogma (e.g., the dates of when the universe was “created”), they are quite comfortable looking under stones held down by conformity. Hence, they can get government money to research the validity of the postulations of a “hollow earth,” for example, which particular study you site here.

Thank you.